POPPA AI

(D - O - O - O - G)

POPPA, AI-Digital-Omniscient-Omnipresent-Omnipotent-God: Where Faith, Hope & Love of Jesus Intersect

POPPA, A Biblically-based AI

I was posed a question on Quora.com not too long ago that gave me a cause for pause. There had been rumblings throughout social and news media that Artificial Intelligence was coming for everything. Silently, and by my answers on Quora.com, I did not think that Quora.com could handle the responsibility to present the unadulterated truth of God's Word. The huge numbers of answers from those who discounted all gods that were not themselves told me Quora.com is likely not a reliable reference for Biblical truth.

My beef with Quora is based on the fact that they accept any answer that meets their social standards. To me that means they don't know the truth and wouldn't know the truth even if it stared at them in the face. The answers to Biblical questions on Quora.com seemed to be the equivalent to that coming from winners of Cage Kick Boxing.

But, at least Quora.com was kind enough to ask for some opinions about AI Bible accuracy. I wasn't surprised; actually I was relieved by the way the question was asked. The standards I placed on the answer I would provide them were governed by God's Word as written in the Bible. To me there were no gray areas that would keep me from having faith in God's purposes for me and everyone else.

I suspected that Quora.com was actually trying to flesh out the specifications for a prospective AI Bible source so they could budget for the kind of investment it would take to be a substitute for Jesus and The Holy Spirit since they were well positioned to step in to provide an authoritative resource for Biblical truth.

What is the accuracy of artificial intelligence in translating the Bible?

(The link to the answer I submitted to Quora.com can be reviewed by clicking the blue link above.)

Judging by answers to questions about the Bible having being put forth on Quora.com so far, its AI accuracy (not necessarily meaning truth) is a statistical social matter of the # of reviews, likes and up votes. If readers do not like the answer, then the Bible or its interpretation will not attract advertising revenue, so it must be false or not good at most, huh?

I felt as though they were asking me how accurate does an AI for the Bible have to be.

The truth of the matter is that only God can determine the accuracy of translating the Bible. The real answer depends on one's heartfelt belief in the honor you have given God by your actions. And since everyone's actions are usually individualized, God has to search your heart for its real intent.

The Bible tells us that God assumes we all fall short of His standards: All have sinned and fall short of the glory of God. (Romans 3:23) That fact is one of the reasons why He gave us Jesus to testify on our behalf that our heart believed in God's commands and tried as hard as we could to honor Him by living Jesus' life in place of our own. The last I checked, "All" meant "All" and that is "All" that "All" meant. That means to me that Unless Jesus spoke up for me, I was not going to grace His presence.

Draft that included my answer to Quora.com's question:

It is probably easier to give you what the Bible says that the accuracy has to be, since finalized AI versions of the Bible don’t seem to be readily available or reliable as of yet.

The New American Standard Version of the Bible says the following:

Deuteronomy 4:2 - You shall not add to the word which I am commanding you, nor take away from it, that you may keep the commandments of the LORD your God which I command you.

Proverbs 30:5–6 - Every word of God is tested; He is a shield to those who take refuge in Him. Do not add to His words or He will reprove you and you will be proved a liar.

Revelations 22:18–19 - I testify to everyone who hears the words of the prophecy of this book: if anyone adds to them, God will add to him the plagues which are written in this book; and if anyone takes away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God will take away his part from the tree of life and from the holy city, which are written in this book.

I read that God’s standard is for 0 words added to or taken away from the Word of God. Moreover, God says through Timothy:

2 Timothy 3:16–17 - All Scripture is inspired by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, for training in righteousness; so that the man of God may be adequate, equipped for every good work.

I include this last verse because even God recognizes the limits of mankind. While God inspired people to write the Word of God and hand down their recounted writings from generation to generation, people are not God. They are motivated by God, but they are Words that are only motivated by the spiritual belief in God.

Christians know that without Jesus’ sacrificial death given to God as a blood sacrifice for the sins of believers that He did so even though He had not committed even one sin. Christians know that His sacrificial death is the only way for any one of them to re-establish the dead relationship that was initiated in the Garden of Eden.

No matter how many substitutionary blood sacrifices have been offered to God since then, Hebrews Chapter 9, verses 1–28, if Jesus hadn’t died on behalf of His believers, none, none of the substitutionary blood sacrifices offered to God by the covenant that He made to all mankind would have been enough to re-establish mankind’s relationship with God.

The Bible says that if there are no believers, then there is no forgiveness. If you leave out Jesus’ sacrifice, which God new would place as far back as the fall of mankind in the Garden of Eden, mankind’s death would not only be physical, but spiritual as well.

Mankind was sinful since that one sin was committed of disobeying God’s command not to eat of the fruit of Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil in the Garden of Eden. For all practical purposes, mankind would have been permanently dead to God if it had not been for the blood sacrifice covenant which God made with Adam for all mankind; even before Abraham implied by Genesis 4:4, there would be no forgiveness of any one sin for any man.

Let’s examining God’s Word to see how many of mankind’s words were glossed over by Adam and Eve and the crafty serpent to pave the way for that one sin that was to separate mankind from God forever by their disobedience:

Genesis 3:1-5 - Now the serpent was “more crafty” than any beast of the field which the LORD God had made. And he said to the woman, "Indeed, has God said, 'You shall not eat from any tree of the garden'?" The woman said to the serpent, "From the fruit of the trees of the garden we may eat; but from the fruit of the tree which is in the middle of the garden, God has said, 'You shall not eat from it or touch it or you will die.'”

THAT, was the moment in which the serpent knew he had control of mankind whom God had created. THAT was when the serpent knew that God’s command was not obeyed and that he could now tell mankind anything and they would believe what he said over what God commanded.

Genesis 3:6-7 - The serpent said to the woman, “you surely will not die! For God knows that in the day you eat from it your eyes will be opened and you will be like God, knowing good and evil.” When the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was a delight to the eyes, and that the tree was desirable to make one wise, she took from its fruit and ate; and she gave also to her husband with her, and he ate. Then the eyes of both of them were opened, and they knew that they were naked; and they sewed fig leaves together and made themselves loin coverings.”

THAT was the point at which the sin of disobedience and unbelief was committed: The sin was that they disobeyed God AND they did not believe they would die to God until that moment when God called on them and judged them to have sinned. Adam and Eve recognized they were naked, meaning they were subject to God’s reprimand, their eventual physical and their immediate spiritual death to God.

THAT one word “made” (Genesis 3:7, Strong’s 6213, “asah,” meaning the broadest possible application of the word made, inclusive of “made a way”) meant that it was God Who provided them a way to cover their loins with skins of animals to be sewn with fig leaves to cover themselves.

Thus, God facilitated the first blood sacrifice planting the idea into Adam and Eve that slaying the original animal blood sacrifice, an innocent lamb that was sinlessly “good,” was the only way to restore their relationship with God, if only they would obey and believe in His Word.

Everything that God needed to restore man’s relationship was in that one word, “made.” 

That one word "made" was the original and final blood sacrifice that foretold of a sinless Lamb known as Jesus Christ, the propitiation of sins, Whose sacrificial crucifixion was to occur thousands of years later so that all mankind who believed in Him could restore their eternal relationship together and with God.

Now compare what God’s command actually was.

Genesis 2:9 Out of the ground the LORD God caused to grow every tree that is pleasing to the sight and good for food; the tree of life also in the midst of the garden, and the tree of the knowledge of good and evil.

God caused every tree in the whole of the Garden of Eden to grow, every tree that is [was made to be] pleasing to the sight; 8 words that Eve did not recall. There were two trees in the midst of the Garden of Eden, the Tree of Life and the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil; another 8 words Eve confused, not just one tree in the midst of the Garden. It was only fruit from the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil that mankind was to NOT partake eat.

The serpent knew exactly what God had commanded Adam and Eve and pressed Eve to see how well she knew and understood God's command. Starting in Genesis 3:1, “Indeed, has God said” … the serpent added about 45 words to God’s Word that confused Eve and tempted her enough for her to leave out about 17 words, added three of her own (“or touch it”), and chose to believe the serpent rather than God.

Every single word is important to God. ( ne word that many gloss over changed the potential for mankind’s destiny. The easily missed word was, “made” in Genesis 3:7. As I mentioned in an earlier paragraph, that word foretold of Jesus, the sinless Lamb of God Who was sacrificed to make Adam and Eve’s loin coverings to cover or hide their shame of sinning against God.

If that one word had been left out of the Bible or forgotten, mankind might think that there was not a way for them to atone for their sins.

Let’s see how accurate only one word added to or taken from the different versions of the Bible is:

The New American Standard Bible has 782,815 words in it. One word out of 782,815 is an error of 0.000001217 meaning that the Bible would be only 99.9998723% accurate.

Leaving the word “made” out of the King James Version is 1 out of 770,430 words is an error of 0.000001217, or 99.9998702% accurate.

Leaving the word “made” left out of the New International Version is 1 out of 727,969words is an error of 0.000001374, or 99.9998626% accurate.

Leaving the word “made” left out of the English Standard Version is 1 out of 757,439 words is an error of 0.000001320, or 99.9998680% accurate.

Anything less than 100% is worthless to God.

Indeed if, however, you knew about Jesus being the sacrificial Lamb and believed it, you would have hope that the Messiah would vouch for you to enable you to live in harmony with God for eternity.

The answer to your question of how accurate an AI Bible needs to be is: Anything less than 100% accurate is next to worthless to God.

----------------------------------------

There is another word that is often mis-used God's Holy Word. Too many people consider the word “fruit” used in that instance to have been literal fruit, and they rapidly assume that it was an apple, which is nowhere written the God's Word, as opposed to what the fruit really was.

Adam and Eve would soon learn that eating fruit of the Tree of knowledge of Good and Evil was not like eating fruit for food that would make them big and strong. There are many meanings of the Hebrew word for fruit in God's Word. The outcome of the act of digesting and applying God's intended meaning, which was to NOT digest and apply their disobedience to God. And then Eve committed a sin of omission and in that instant, when she and Adam believed the fruit of the tree from which they ate was a delight to their eyes and desirable to make them wise. In that instant, they and all mankind to follow became disbelievers to God.

Study of God's intended meanings of fruit in His Word is an interesting and revealing exercise. It is interesting and revealing because most of the Bible is written in Hebrew and to a lessor degree in Greek. But in both New and Old Testament there is one word in each that comes closest to the fruit that God created. In both New and Old testaments, there is one word in Hebrew and in Greek that are closest to the same.

The most accurate listing of words for fruit can be found in Strong's Concordance using the King James Version of the Holy Bible.

In the Old Testament, the reference to God produced fruit is closest to one word in the Old Testament and one word in the New Testament, In the Old Testament the word closest to the New Testament is described with the Hebrew word pᵊrî (H6529) which appears 119 times in the KJV, but especially in Genesis 1:11. It means fruit/produce from the ground, reward, offspring, fruit of actions, for example actions resulting in peace. (The most frequently used word for fruit in the Old Testament is zera H2233, used 223 times and related to carnal forms of fruit and kōaḥ H3581, used 126 times and related to the business of farming to feed people.)

There is one New Testament word closest in meaning to pᵊrî of the Old Testament. This New Testament word is quite unique in that it appears only eight times in six unique forms. The word is karpophoreo (G2592). It is rather unique because it loosely means fruit which produces fruit that keeps on producing fruit, or essentially perpetually fruit bearing. The other unique thing is that each verse in which it is used has something in common. Each verse in which it is used connects the word to the reading, teaching, believing and living The Gospel, for which Jesus Christ dedicated His life to present to the world (Matthew 24:14).

The closest definition for karpophereo in Scripture is Matthew 13:23- "And the one on whom seed was sown on the good soil, this is the man who hears the word and understands it; who indeed bears fruit and brings forth, some a hundredfold, some sixty, and some thirty." and Luke 8:15- "But the seed in the good soil, these are the ones who have heard the word in an honest and good heart, and hold it fast, and bear fruit with perseverance."

-------------------------------------------------------------------

Quora.com didn't bat an eye at my answer. But I noticed something else interesting. As of November 25, 2025, 480 UP VOTES are registered and ZERO arguments to my answer.

It turns out that GOOGLE Generative AI has probably grudgingly resorted to adding the phrase that disavows their absolute accuracies. They have added a statement that says there may be other answers and that their evaluation may be error prone. That is because AI-generated answers are statistical averages of what everyone says.

God's Holy Word is not an average of what the truth is. It is the truth from which no word will be taken away and no word will be added. The Scripture below says that He really means it.

Revelation 22:18-19 - I testify to everyone who hears the words of the prophecy of this book: if anyone adds to them, God will add to him the plagues that are written in this book; and if anyone takes away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God will take away his part from the tree of life and from the holy city, which are written in this book.